Now, you might argue that because it is my choice to read posts in newest-to-oldest order, I have taken it upon myself to figure out the sorting and references and too bad for me if it isn't chronological the way the author intended. I would counter by saying that by choosing to publish a RSS feed you are putting your content out there in a way that you should reasonably expect someone to consume it differently from what you intended. Maybe most people *don't* read in reverse chronological order like I do, but other methods of getting to your post, like permanent linking into archives, etc. will suffer the same problem.
I do have a solution to go with all this griping: make the reference to the other location a hyperlink. Keep on using the locational language if you have to (it *does* admittedly add at least some context in the sense that it points to a time in the past, but link to it as well, so that if I am looking at a feed with only the one post on it and you refer to something else and I want to know what the heck you are talking about, I can just follow the link.
Here's an example:
- Down below, when I made fun of Comcast, I forgot to take into account that I might be hurting their feelings of fiber-envy.
- Earlier, when I made fun of Comcast, I forgot to take into account that I might be hurting their feelings of fiber-envy.
Which is easier to follow?
3 comments:
I agree with your point, not just because I get RSS feeds but also because a blogger can't guarantee that all readers will have read all entries in order. For example, if you write something pithy on a subject that becomes hot enough six months later for someone to link to your entry, those new readers will have none of the context. In this regard writing for a blog is similar to writing for a newspaper.
Just curious: what do you do with blogs (e.g., Daring Fireball) whose RSS feed only provides a summary? Do you click-through? Or do you just skip those blogs?
I skip them. I see no reason why I should go to the trouble of clicking over to somebody's web site to see their content, and I can't think of any good reason why they should force me to.
Plus, I am a big mobile browser user, so everything is slower and smaller, meaning I really have to want to go to a site rather than read its feed.
Sounds reasonable.
Post a Comment